Approved: 9/14/04
Selectmen’s Meeting Minutes
June 21, 2004
The Board of Selectmen met this evening at the Easton Town
Offices, Selectmen’s Office with Chair Colleen Corona present. Also in
attendance were John Haederle, Gerard Marsan, Colleen Less, Charles King and
Town Administrator Martha White. (7:00pm)
Haederle was not present at this point of the meeting.
Public
Participation
None
Approval of
Contract for Affordable Housing Plan
White explained the
need for the plan and noted one bidder.
The contract amount is more than what the Community Preservation Act
Committee approved for funding. White
suggested that the board approve the contract, having the Town Accountant sign
to certify the funds, proving the contract is approved with the intention not
to move forward until the complete funding becomes available. (Haederle arrived at this point of the
meeting 7:15pm). Marsan asked if the funds could be encumbered
without the board’s approval of the contract.
Marsan also expressed concern that if we are not ready to move forward
anyway, we may come up with additional protocols to include in the
contract. White explained that anything
of significance should have been added to the request for proposals. White explained the need for the vote. King expressed concern with only getting one
bidder. White clarified questions of the
bidder prior to them submitting the bid, having complete confidence in the
company.
On Haederle’s motion,
seconded by King, the board voted unanimously to approve the contract with Community
Opportunities Group, Inc.
Transfer of
Restaurant All Alcohol License from Spasso, Inc. dba Spoleto’s to 285 North,
Inc. dba Hemisphere, new Common
Victualler and Entertainment Licenses (285 Washington Street)
Mario Sanfilippo was
present. Sanfilippo explained the
request for the transfer of the liquor license and the other pertinent
licenses.
Haederle read the
notice of hearing and other supporting documents. White noted that department comments all came
back fine. Sanfilippo explained minor
renovations and the change in the menu.
On Less’ motion,
seconded by King, the board voted unanimously to approve the transfer of the restaurant
all alcohol license, new common victualler and entertainment licenses.
Class II Application
– 5 Corners Petroleum, Inc. (490 Foundry Street)
Applicant Fadi Daher
was present. Haederle read the notice of hearing. White referred to the certified cards as
notification to abutters.
White noted that all
departments reviewed the application. White
and the Town Planner have expressed concern with the Rt. 106/five corners
renovation. White suggested that if any
future widening is needed of the intersection, it might affect the licensed
property. White asked that the board not
act on this license application until she can advise if this license would
affect the five corners plan. White
expressed concern with the number of proposed vehicles at this site and would
ask that the Planning Board review this proposal as there is currently not an
approved site plan at this location. Daher
explained that he is in the process of buying the property. Daher explained that he is flexible with the
number of cars to be sold at this location.
Corona asked what impact this would have on his
business. White explained that we would
only delay action until the Planning Board approves the plan showing what the
site can safely accommodate with respect to the number of vehicles for
sale. Haederle asked for clarification
of the site. Daher noted he is not
planning to expand the footprint of the building at all. The board discussed the VHB proposal of
widening the road in that area. White
suggested that the board table this discussion to a date certain. Marsan expressed concern with how long it
would take to get Planning Board approval and how it would affect the
applicant. White explained that this
type of activity is currently not approved by the Planning and again suggested
that they should approve it before the board grants the license. White felt that some number can be accommodated
but the Planning Board’s input is important.
White offered to meet with the property owner if necessary.
On Marsan’s motion,
seconded by Less, the board voted unanimously that due to lack of sufficient information
to move forward, the board continue the hearing to 8/2/ 04.
Ambulance Bill
Abatements
Town Accountant
Wendy Nightingale, Administrative Secretary Pam Berglund and Fire Chief Tom
Stone were present.
Nightingale
explained the bills were prior to the outsource billing with COMSTAR. Nightingale also noted that there would be
approximately $50,000 more to approve. The
contractual write offs were discussed.
Haederle asked if the money shows as receivables. Nightingale answered yes and explained the
ledger process. King asked about the
time period. Nightingale explained FY’00
– FY02. She explained that no abatements
were done prior to COMSTAR and further explained the efforts of working with
Deputy Collector/Treasurer on how to move forward.
On Marsan’s motion,
seconded by King, the board voted unanimously to abate $136,768.16 as requested.
Transfer of
Restaurant All Alcohol License from T&K Casa, Inc dba Doyle’s Bar &
Grill to
KDeware, Inc. dba
Doyle’s Bar & Grill, new Common Victualler and Entertainment Licenses
White noted that the
application for transfer has been withdrawn.
Presentation by
Task Force for Senior Center Development
Task Force for
Senior Center Development members Nick Mirrione, Elizabeth Verity, Denise
Higgins, Bill McAndrews, Council on Aging (COA) Director Delores Kent were
present. Mirrione gave a status report with
respect to the approved committee charge.
See attached information.
Mirrione spoke of a proposed financing plan. Mirrione referenced a 10 acre parcel owned by
Stonehill College, specifically located between the cemetery
and the clock farm. Kent noted the concept of building for the future
based on our current population of our current 35- 55 year old citizens and the
endless possibilities of the senior center.
Mirrione noted the concept of using the property as a multi purpose area
for different town sponsored events community yard sale, arts and crafts sale, Girl
Scout cookie sales, etc. Kent also spoke of the possibilities of working
with Stonehill College.
Mirrione noted that they have met with Stonehill College to discuss the parcel and concept. The college is looking for a theatre and they
may be willing to donate the parcel if the Selectmen endorse the plan for the
senior center. Mirrione spoke of long
term leasing, not a purchase. Mirrione
asked for the Selectmen’s endorsement and an amendment to the charge. They have developed a plan that would require
fundraising. Mirrone asked to amend
the charge to reflect a change, to no longer have a need to work with the
Municipal Building Committee because of the private venture. Stonehill would
still own the parcel. Mirrone spoke of
the legal and accounting professionals they are volunteering their services. Mirrione again reiterated that no tax
dollars will be spent. Marsan reiterated
the plan and the funding now available to support the COA and how it would
differ with the new proposal. Marsan
questioned once the building is built and in force, if there still would be a
need for new staffing and additional funds to operate the center. Kent agreed that it would be necessary. Marsan agreed that this town is not
spending enough on senior services. Marsan
also reiterated that without a partner like Stonehill, we could not go
forward. Mirrone spoke of a $1.5 million
endowment to start with hopes of raising more money as time goes on to expand
the programs. Mirrione referred to this
as at least a $5 million dollar campaign.
$3.5 million may go to the building.
Furnishing will be needed, etc. Mirrone
hopes to do all of this in the next three years. Less asked about the proposed model and if it
was used in other communities. Mirrione
referred to the Town of Yarmouth and how things worked for them. Kent spoke of the Town of Winchester, owned and run by non profit, situated on town
owned land. The non profit raises funds
to operate. Kent spoke of other communities and their
funding. The board congratulated the
Task Force on the proposal. Kent noted that the COA has a donation account
set up with a balance of $7,700 to date.
Marsan questioned if we amend the charge and if we would be contracting
now with the senior center for staff, etc.
Marsan reiterated the point that the municipality would not be in
control of decisions as the town would no longer be the owner of the operation
any longer as they would be partnering with private to provide the
services. Mirrone suggested that when
the time is appropriate that one member of the Selectmen become a member of the
Board of Directors. Mirrione noted the
need to move forward with the intention of coming back to the board in three
months with reports from the attorney and the accountant on the status of the
structure. Marsan expressed concern that
if this is not a viable plan, we may have lost progress with a town senior
center. Marsan noted that the people
need to understand that this is not the traditional model. Kent responded that this is a wonderful way to go
forward because the town has no money to fund and has not made any progress,
other than this partnership. Marsan
noted he is in favor but felt that the discussion needed to take place so that
the citizens understand. Verity suggested
that Easton is the only town that does not have a senior
center.
On Haederle’s motion, seconded by Marsan, the board voted unanimously to approve
the direction and scope that the committee has taken and have them present the
findings in three months.
On Haederle’s motion, seconded by King, the board voted unanimously to amend
the current charge as attached b3 amended, b4 deleted. Corona submitted a donation at this time.
On Haederle’s motion,
seconded by King, the board voted unanimously to take a brief recess at 8:35pm.
The board reconvened
open session at 8:45pm.
Annual
Appointments- Uncontested
On Less’ motion,
seconded by Marsan, the board voted unanimously by roll-call to appoint Debra Harding to the Industrial
Development Finance Authority for a term expiring 6/30/06.
Less-Harding, Corona-
Harding, King-Harding, Marsan- Harding, Haederle-Harding.
On Less’ motion,
seconded by King, the board voted unanimously by roll-call to appoint
Margaret Ryan to the Housing Partnership for a term expiring 6/30/07.
Marsan-Ryan,
Haederle-Ryan, Corona-Ryan, King-Ryan, Less-Ryan.
On Less’ motion,
seconded by King, the board voted unanimously by roll-call to appoint Alan Weeks to the Planning Board
for a term expiring 6/30/09.
Less-Weeks,
King-Weeks, Haederle-Weeks, Marsan-Weeks, Corona-Weeks.
On Less’ motion,
seconded by Marsan, the board voted unanimously by roll-call to reappoint Jay Conceison to the Permanent
Landfill Committee for a term expiring 6/30/07.
King-Conceison, Corona-Conceison,
Haederle-Conceison, Less-Conceison, Marsan-Conceison.
On Less’s motion,
seconded by Marsan, the board voted unanimously by roll-call to reappoint Peter Buckley and Phillip White
as Constables for terms expiring 6/30/07.
Marsan-Buckley&White,
Less - Buckley&White, Haederle - Buckley&White, King - Buckley&White, Corona-
Buckley&White
On Haederle’s motion,
seconded by Less, the board voted unanimously by roll-call to reappoint Jean Cote to the Registrar of
Voters for a term expiring 6/30/07.
Haederle-Cote, Corona-Cote,
King-Cote, Marsan-Cote, Less-Cote
Annual Appointments – Contested (Interviews
Required)
Recreation Commission
(2 vacancies, 4
applicants)
Mike McDonald – 81 Kennedy Circle
McDonald noted he is
currently the Chairman of the Recreation Commission. He gave background on his involvement with
the soccer league, Vice President of the OAHS Swim and Dive Booster Club. He noted he is reapplying for his position on
the Recreation Commission. Corona asked about his goals. McDonald noted the commission’s
accountability for the programs and expanding the focus on the town’s
recreational field space. Less asked if
the soccer fields would be ready for the fall season. McDonald noted the fields would not be ready
until next spring. McDonald spoke of the
expanded recreation programs and noted the enhancement of all the programs,
inviting the citizens to participate.
Steve Torrey – 23 Highland Street.
Torrey noted he
served on the Board of Directors for Pop Warner Football. He also acknowledged that he recently
resigned from Recreation Commission for several reasons. He noted his past involvement with the CPA
Committee. Torrey felt that the need for
recreation still exists and he continues to work for the town’s recreational
needs. Corona asked about his resignation and why he is
reapplying. Torrey felt that at the
time of resignation there were personal reasons that have since been resolved,
some others have not. King asked about
the goals that the Recreation Commission should have and his opinion on them
and if his goals would become as problem with the town. Torrey spoke of the High School field issue
and noted that he does not intend to promote his personal opinion of the
Recreation Commission. Torrey does not
feel that his opinion will impact the commission. Less asked about the resignation in January
and if there are still outstanding issues and if so, if he is still wishing to
pursue the issues. He spoke of the
problem of keeping the Recreation Department in the basement and how the site
is not appropriate. He spoke of the
inadequate space and the difficulty for handicapped people. Marsan asked about Torrey’s frustration at
the time of resignation and how Torrey at that time felt that he had done all
he could at that time for the town.
Torrey spoke of his frustration and his six years on the commission and
what was accomplished overall. Torrey
felt he needed a break and noted that he is proud of what has been accomplished
over the last few years in spite of the lack of funding. The participation in recreation has doubled
over the last few years. He spoke of the
department some day becoming self supporting with their own fees. King asked if he is not chosen tonight, if he
will still offer his services to the town.
Torrey spoke of his accomplishments and how he has expressed his
determination and noted that he committed back years ago not to go away until
the problem is resolved. Marsan spoke of
the importance of volunteering and having a vision for a particular group, and
questioned if he would have a conflict if the committee has already determined
a course of action. Torrey explained
that he has always acted in the best interest of the town.
David Lang – 30 Roundtable Road
Lang indicated he
has lived in Easton for 11 years and has finance background and is a CPA. His interest in the Recreation Commission
comes from his three young children. He
feels he has a vested interest. Others
have encouraged him to apply. He noted
his love for sports and acknowledged that he has not held a town position but
has served on numerous corporate boards.
Haederle asked what skills he would bring to the board. Lang noted he would bring fiscal
responsibility. He understands how to
run projects and understands funding. As
far as the existing programs go, he currently does not have enough knowledge
but feels that he should know what the town should offer and suggested looking
at what the taxpayers want us to offer.
Less asked about self funding aspect and if he has had experience
looking at this. Lang suggested a
Friends of Recreation Commission, putting the funds to use.
Jerome Zeidman – 27 Walden Drive
Mr. Zeidman asked
that his name be withdrawn.
On Marsan’s motion,
seconded by Less, the board voted unanimously by roll-call to reappoint Mike MacDonald for a term
expiring 6/30/07.
Less-McDonald, Marsan-McDonald, Haederle-McDonald,
King-McDonald, Corona-McDonald.
On Corona’s motion,
seconded by Less, the board voted 3-2 by roll-call to appoint David Lang to the Recreation
Commission for a term expiring 6/30/07.
Corona-Lang, Less-Lang, Haederle-Torrey, King-Lang, Marsan-Torrey
Library Board
(2 vacancies, 4 applicants)
Hazel Varella – 121 Center Street
Hazel Varella was
not present due to her scheduled vacation.
Kathy Boyle – 32 Day
Street.
Boyle gave
background noting that she is a teacher for Easton Public Schools and has
served for four terms on Library Board.
Boyle noted her initial involvement as a Friend of the library. She
acknowledged the tremendous strides made by the library over the years but also
acknowledged the need to do much more.
She spoke of the
library project and would like to continue to work on the project.
At this point Marsan
disclosed that he is a member of the Library Board of Directors and has asked
for an opinion from the Ethics Commission.
In summary, because the library is recognized as a town entity, there is
no conflict.
Less asked Boyle if
she would continue her role on the library board after the project is
complete. Boyle noted she has no
intention of leaving the board. At this
time it was noted that the Library Board submitted correspondence in support of
the two incumbents, Boyle and Varella. King spoke of the town’s perception with
respect to the financial aspect and the library’s endowment money. Boyle spoke of the frustration and the
methods they have used to educate the public on the financial aspect of the
library. She noted that the endowment
money is restricted. Only the interest
earned, only for specified purposes can the money be used. She gave examples of how the funding can be
used. Boyle encouraged members of the
community to contact the Library Board or the Director with any questions they
may have. Haederle disagreed with King’s
comments and finds that the public perception is contrary to what King referred
to. King explained that he attended a
library board meeting recently and he himself found that the board was helpful
and that this dispelled the comments he had heard.
Kevin Kidd – 31 Barrows Street
Kidd referred to his
residency in Easton for the last two years. He is a professional and specialized in
library systems. He has not served on a
town board or library board in the past.
He feels that he has a clear impression on what the library does. He spoke of the library addition project and
feels that he can consult on library services.
He has a Masters Degree in Library Services as well. Corona asked if he was not appointed, if he would
consider becoming a Friend of the Library.
Kidd indicated that he would be happy to serve in that capacity. Less reiterated that she is also impressed
with his experience and noted the incumbents and the ongoing library
project.
Stephen Lyons – 6 Pinebrook Lane
Lyons noted his business background, specifically
his experience as contract administrator.
He is at a point that he can donate time and is an avid library
user. He would like to help Easton’s library grow. Corona noted his experience and thanked him.
At this point Marsan
commented also about Easton’s volunteerism and the people coming forward. The number of excellent
qualified, skillful people is encouraging.
Marsan noted that in the past, the town was unable to fill
positions.
On Marsan’s motion,
seconded by Less, the board voted unanimously by roll-call to reappoint Varella and Boyle to the
Library Board for terms expiring 6/30/07 and encourage the others to get
involved with the Friends of the Library
King –Boyle,Varella; Haederle – Boyle,Varella; Less - Boyle,Varella; Corona- Boyle,Varella; Marsan –
Boyle,Varella;
Municipal Building
Committee
(2 vacancies, 4 applicants)
Ralph Vatalaro – 8
Riverside Terrace
Vatalaro noted his
goal, moving forward with the two school renovation projects along with other
projects that have been tabled because of this project. He spoke of his construction experience and
keeping politics aside. Vatalaro noted
the importance of doing what is best for the project and the importance of
putting your best foot forward. King
asked about his experience on the construction.
Vatalaro explained his involvement with 80 million dollar hotels to the
construction of office buildings and his involvement from start to finish. He has served 1 ½ years on the Municipal
Building Committee.
Paul Mullen – 40 Highland Street
Mullen spoke of his
goal to serve on the committee to ensure the completion of the projects at
hand. Corona asked about dealing with political
issues. Mullen noted the importance of
sticking with the committee charge, avoiding political issues. Mullen noted that he has served on the
municipal building and School Building and Site Committee 6 years ago.
Henry Mehler – 9 Western Ave
Mehler gave his
background and involvement with the Permanent Landfill Committee in the
past. He currently works for Department
of Defense and oversees building issues.
Less asked if he had attended any Municipal Building Committee
meetings. Mehler indicated he had not.
Mark Jennings – 5 Arthur Road
Jennings expressed his interest in the new projects,
having over 20 years experience with project manager background. He is involved in cub scouts and youth soccer. He was encouraged by friends
and family to apply. He is familiar with
current bidding structure. With respect
to the school project, he would like to see the town get the best for its
dollar.
Haederle noted the
touch decision with the many qualified applicants.
On Less’ motion,
seconded by Marsan, the board voted unanimously by roll-call to appoint Vatalaro and Mullen to the Municipal
Building Committee for terms expiring 6/30/05.
Haederle – Mullen, Vatalaro; Marsan – Mullen, Vatalaro;
King – Mullen, Vatalaro; Less – Mullen, Vatalaro; Corona – Mullen,
Vatalaro.
Any individual who was
not appointed was encouraged to consider other vacancies.
Mehler spoke of a
vacancy on the Wastewater Study Committee and the decision not to fill the
vacancy. Mehler asked that the board
fill the vacancy. White explained the
decision not to fill the vacancy. After
discussion, the board expressed interest in revisiting the decision. The board agreed to discuss this on a future
agenda.
Saw Mill Pond
Apartments LIP Project Discussion – Location off Foundry Street
Attorney Mark Bobrowski was present representing Developer Nick Mirrione on
the proposed project.
Karen Zomick of 578 Foundry Street was present and referred to a letter dated 6/17/04 and the fact that Mirrione said that the
neighborhood would be notified of the discussion. She asked that this be discussed again in the
future for the public to provide input. Corona agreed to notice the abutters when the issue
is discussed again. Bobrowski
noted that Mirrione contacted all direct abutters that live on Foundry Street. They
will make the same attempt of notification when discussed again. Bobrowski noted
that the purpose of the presentation this evening is to ask for the board’s
endorsement of a Local Initiative Project (LIP). A presentation was shown to the board. The three direct abutters on Foundry Street were notified of this meeting. Mirrione has offered to purchase the homes if
they want to sell at fair market price.
If they were to move out, it would be the intent to rent the unit with
full disclosure of the 144 unit apartment complex. Architect David O’Sullivan, noted the three
to four story building and trees to scale with the buildings. Bobrowski referred to DHCD housing inventory
as of 4/24/04. If approved, this proposal would help meet
the town’s affordable housing need and no other LIP’s would be needed over the
next few years unless the board so chooses.
Bobrowski explained the process/time frame if the Selectmen endorse the
project as LIP. If the project were to
move forward, Mirrione would most likely not receive building permits until the
spring of 2005. Engineer Scott Faria
explained the proposal further with respect to the site development 20 acres,
including the treatment plan. The Selectmen
posed questions relative to the proposal.
O’Sullivan explained in detail the 144 unit garage parking under the
complex. Corona asked about visitor parking. O’Sullivan explained
that the underground spaces would be assigned to the residents and the surface
spaces would be used for visitors and extra vehicles per unit. Bobrowski spoke of the studies done to
confirm the average number of spaces. He
also spoke of the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) process and the opportunity for
more questions to be asked prior to approval given. Marsan asked about restrictions with respect
to type of vehicles. It was noted that
there would be restrictions, no campers etc.
Other variations of apartments were discussed, i.e. elevator units. Corona asked about the landscaping plan to shelter
the homes. O’Sullivan explained the
space and the intent to landscape. One
and two bedroom apartment layouts were displayed. Haederle asked about the visual impact from the
street and what plans exists if the direct abutters choose to sell. Haederle would like to see a scale model showing
the proximity to Belcher Foundry, also including the view from the street. Haederle also suggested that more resources may
need to become available while reviewing the proposal. White suggested that a lot of staff people have
assisted in the process of reviewing the application. White referred to the attached memo dated 6/17/04.
Marsan asked a couple of general questions relating to zoning for the
parcel. O’Sullivan responded that it is primarily residential. Marsan felt that under our current zoning
bylaw, apartments are not allowed in residential areas. He asked if they would be asking for a
variance to accommodate the apartments.
Bobrowski noted no, the comprehensive permit would address the
issue. Bobrowski noted that the ZBA
has the authority to address this under the 40B proposal. Marsan asked if the Board gave LIP endorsement
,what it would mean. Bobrowski
noted that the 40B is a friendly agreement and needed to go forward. The board’s endorsement and state DHCD
eligibility letter is needed to get to the ZBA.
The ZBA is the granting authority for the comprehensive permit. Marsan asked how the board would participate
with ZBA. Marsan referred to the issue
of endorsement and moving forward while the board may still having difference
with certain things such as types of apartments, parking, etc. Bobrowksi noted that if the board gives LIP, the board
would be endorsing the project. Bobrowski
noted that at this point, it is only conceptual and will change based on required
changes. Bobrowski is aware of the site
constraints and the fact that they may need to reduce the number of apartments,
based on what comes down the road.
Marsan summarized that the board may endorse 144 apartments, as
presented this evening but it may change as the details become more known, with
communication with the ZBA accordingly. Corona spoke of Haederle’s request for a scaled
model and noted that she walked the site and the model may be helpful. The board again reviewed the plan with the
scale. White reviewed the memo in detail and reviewed
the fourteen recommendations. Bobrowski
responded where appropriate. Denise
Higgins of 4 New Pond Way noted the fashion that the board is reviewing the request. Higgins questioned whether the board should
even consider the application as 40B.
Marsan explained the reason for the process of reviewing the
recommendations. Babrowski spoke of the
rental aspect of the proposal with respect to the conditions. Bobrowski felt that it is unreasonable to
have these types of restrictions with this type of project. Marsan suggested adding Haederle’s idea of a
scale to the list that White has created.
Bobrowski felt that they have given the board more than what it
necessary for the conceptual stage. The
purpose of LIP is to expedite for the project noting that time is of the
essence. He spoke of the town’s low
percentage of affordable housing at this point.
Higgins noted that she has a personal interest and expressed concern
with the 144 units. She spoke of the
impact of the school system and traffic.
She is also concerned with the height of the buildings. Higgins also
questioned how this proposal would affect the historic district specifically
noting the substantial impact on the neighborhood. She endorses affordable housing but questions
if this is the right project. Marsan
spoke of Higgins’ concerns and how well thought out and real they are. Marsan noted the challenge of fulfilling affordable
housing and the request before us to endorse a 40B project. Marsan suggested that other locations may
have more of an impact. King asked about
jurisdiction when it is a LIP application.
Bobrowski explained. King asked
specific questions about the location of the sand pits, locations of bus stops,
and the safety issue at that location. Bobrowski
discussed a balloon plan as a possible way of showing the project to scale and
again asked for the board’s endorsement this evening noting that good models
take a long time to produce and are expensive.
Corona proposed that this could be discussed at the
next meeting on 7/12. Corona suggested that by giving endorsement this
evening, it would be out of the board’s hands.
Higgins again asked that the board look at the issue as to whether this is
the right project. Haederle suggested
that given the whole community and the proximity of this location to highways,
shopping, etc. this is a decent location for this type of project. Bobrowski noted that they have issues to work
out with respect to traffic. They will
work on drainage, and get a wastewater system to work. The remaining issues are only for looks. With this technical review, we now know what
we will be submitting to the ZBA. Less
also expressed concern with what the area will look like noting that some type
of plan will be submitted either way.
The Selectmen asked the developer to raise balloons to show the four
corners of the building closest to Foundry Street and the largest building. The board asked White to obtain data
regarding appropriate mitigation fee per unit by the next meeting on 7/12/04. Bobrowski
noted that his client disagreed with item #8 of the recommendations. After much discussion, it was agreed that on Monday,
6/28 at 6:30pm, the
balloon proposal will take place at the site.
White will inform the review team members of this date and time.
FY’05
Reappointment of Special Police Officers
White noted the
annual vote required for the appointment of Special Police Officers.
On Haederle’s motion,
seconded by Less, the board voted unanimously by roll-call to approve the slate. (see attached)
Less-slate,
Corona-slate, Marsan-slate, King-slate, Haederle-slate.
Consideration of
Contracts for Transportation Plan Review Services
White explained the
five corners project and the need to approve the contracts to Vannasse Hangen
Brustlin, Inc. One contract is for the Highland Plaza traffic study and one is for the Saw Mill
Apartment proposal. No town money will
be spent as all the money will be paid by the developers.
On Haederle’s motion,
seconded by King, the board voted unanimously to approve both contracts #08909.01 and
#08909.02.
Discussion
re: Selectmen’s Meeting Schedule
Corona explained
the request from the Municipal Building Committee to approve the contracts for
the two school renovation projects.
After much discussion, the board agreed to revise their meeting schedule
to not meet on 7/19/04 but instead
would meet on 7/12/04, 7/26/04 and 8/12/04.
Town Administrator’s Notes
White announced that the Town of Easton
has received a credit for insurance premiums for FY’05 due to our participation
in the MIIA Rewards Program.
Press Notes
None
Selectmen’s Notes
Corona made note of the Children’s Museum Father’s
Day Fun Run held yesterday.
On King’s motion,
seconded by Haederle, the board voted unanimously to adjourn at 11:50pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Southworth
____________________________________
Approved
____________________________________
Date